Monday, October 31, 2005

TomTom Garmin GPS Slugfest

Garmin's GPS Slugfest

Garmin and TomTom are battling to bring GPS to consumers. Who has the tools to take the advantage?

By Jim Gillies
October 31, 2005

The latest "must-have" personal electronic gadget is the Personal Navigation Device (PND). Combining global positioning system (GPS) navigation capabilities with preloaded maps featuring millions of points of interest (gas stations, restaurants, local attractions), these little devices are expected to be big sellers this holiday season. Leading the PND wave are Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick Garmin (Nasdaq: GRMN) and European upstart TomTom, both of whom released their third-quarter earnings last week. Despite expectations for a massive earnings blowout, results from both companies were only extremely good. Consequently, Garmin was down nearly 12% in the day following its report, and TomTom, trading in Europe, was off over 18%.

Competition is good for companies, so long as they don't self-immolate in a rush to beat down their competitors. In this respect, TomTom looks like Garmin's biggest challenge to date. Other competitors such as Lowrance Electronics (Nasdaq: LEIX) are too small to mount an effective threat, and other GPS specialists such as Trimble Navigation (Nasdaq: TRMB) are sticking to applications outside of the PND sphere.

Comparing the products
I believe Garmin is at least temporarily playing catch-up here. On the PND front, TomTom's GO products got the jump on the market, before Garmin responded with their c-Series and now i-Series of product lines. Both sets of products offer 3D graphical navigation and turn-by-turn voice instruction, but the TomTom units also built in hands-free calling via a Bluetooth™ connection to your similarly equipped mobile phone. While Garmin's iQue M5 PDA (personal digital assistant) offering has Bluetooth™ capability, their PND offerings don't -- yet.

In addition, Garmin's "Mobile" offering, allowing smartphone users to turn their phones into in-car navigators, was just launched this past September. TomTom's comparable offering launched nearly a year earlier. It shouldn't be surprising that TomTom appears so adept at mobile wireless offerings; their background lies in software and application development for smartphones and PDAs.

It's one thing to take a lead, but it's another thing to hold it, and that's where I think Garmin has the advantage.

Keep the pipeline moving
As I wrote in my last article on Garmin, the pace of GPS development is getting faster and faster, increasing pressure on R&D and manufacturing. This works in Garmin's favor; the company designs and manufactures its goods in-house, which lowers its costs while increasing its ability to redesign existing products or launch new ones. Its steady stream of new products indicates that Garmin isn't afraid of cannibalizing its own product lines to keep pace with development.

Supporting this, look at how new products have influenced Garmin's sales year to date:


Q1 '05

Q2 '05

Q3 '05

Sales ($million)

$192.7

$264.5

$251.3

Units Sold (thousands)

583

707

708

% of Sales from Products
released in past 12 months

31%

38%

44%

Anyone else see an accelerating trend? As consumer appetites continue to seek the "latest and greatest," and R&D and manufacturing remain key, how do our players stack up? The answer overwhelmingly favors Garmin; they outstrip TomTom by a factor of seven in new spending.


R&D
Spending
2004 TTM*

R&D as %
of Rev.
2004 TTM

Spending
Q3 '05

% of
Rev.
Q3 '05

Garmin

$61.6

8.1%

$72.8

7.8%

TomTom**

$6.8

2.6%

$10.5

1.7%

* Dollar figures in millions.
** TomTom results translated from Euros using exchange rates of 0.7357 EUR/USD and 0.8294 EUR/USD, as at 31-Dec-04 and 30-Sep-05 respectively

True, Garmin's product offering is much wider than TomTom's, but since the PND market promises to be the bread-and-butter space for GPS participants in the future, they'll likely be directing a disproportionate amount of their R&D spending toward that segment.

The other point to consider is that Garmin controls nearly every step in the design, engineering and manufacture of its products, while TomTom outsources most of these functions. Outsourcing may help TomTom cut costs, but Garmin's in-house processes and overall nimbleness still keep it ahead. Garmin's consumer division enjoys fatter margins, at 31% to TomTom's 28.2%.

Getting the word out
It's great to develop new and exciting products -- but only if folks are aware of them. This is especially true for a product line like PND's, which are now just entering the average consumer's price range. As a company largely made up of engineers, Garmin has been a little light on the marketing side in the past. (I say that as an engineer myself; we have a predilection for doing cool work and assuming customers will come to us.)

Both companies have promised high-priced multimedia advertising blitzes for the holiday season, but TomTom has been rather aggressive on the marketing front all along. They've recently partnered with Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX) AOL-owned Mapquest unit to launch a Mapquest-branded PND, and have popped up on NFL broadcasts in recent weeks. Take a look at recent efforts of both companies:


Mktg./
Advtg. Spending 2004 TTM*

Mktg./
Advtg. as % of revenue 2004 TTM

Spending Q3 '05

% of revenue Q3 '05

Garmin

$29.6

3.9%

$38.3**

4.1%

TomTom***

$26.7

10.2%

$45.4

7.2%

* Dollar figures in millions.
** Estimated based on historical spending levels (Garmin doesn't break this number out quarterly).
** TomTom results translated from Euros using exchange rates of 0.7357 EUR/USD and 0.8294 EUR/USD, as at 31-Dec-04 and 30-Sep-05 respectively.

What are the companies aiming for with these efforts and promised greater expenditures? To me, it looks like aggressive attempts on the part of each company to better penetrate the other's core market: TomTom into North America, and Garmin into Europe. So how have they fared?

Garmin Geographic
Sales (in millions)

2004 TTM
(Q3 '04)

2005 TTM
(Q3 '05)

% of 2005
Total

Europe

$195.9

$270.1

29.1%

N. America

$532.5

$614.7

66.1%

Asia / Rest of World

$34.2

$44.7

4.8%

Total

$762.5

$929.4



TomTom
Geographic Sales

2004 TTM
(Q3 '04)

2005 TTM
(Q3 '05)

% of 2005
Total

Europe

€186.8

€497.7

95.6%

N. America

€ 5.6

€ 19.0

3.7%

Asia / Rest of World

N/A

€ 3.9

0.8%

Total

€192.4

€520.6


The historical results, at least, favor Garmin. Admittedly, Garmin's numbers include their Aviation division, as well as other consumer product lines outside of PNDs, but their European presence far outstrips the TomTom's North American presence. That gives Garmin an excellent base for driving further PND sales.

The Foolish bottom line
Aggressive holiday sales campaigns are planned. Inventory channels are stocked in preparation for the holiday buying season. In the short term, the fight looks to be a doozy. Yet I think Garmin holds the long-term advantage, particularly if their marketing efforts bear fruit. With their in-house design and engineering specialty, they can keep up a relentless pace in an accelerating product-cycle environment, forcing TomTom to match or fall back. Still, TomTom is focused, well-capitalized, competitor with significant know-how in the mobile arena. It should be an interesting battle.

Garmin and Time Warner are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. If you sign up for a free trial, you will receive access to this and over 60 additional active picks. Click here for more details.

Jim Gillies owns shares of Garmin and is long $45 Jan07 Garmin calls and short $35 Jan06 Garmin puts. He'd love a Garmin i5, if any readers are feeling generous! Lowrance Electronics has appeared as a Motley Fool Hidden Gems Tiny Gem. Send Jim feedback!

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Location importance to google

CRITICAL COMPONENT: LOCATION

Ron also asked about Google's plans to buy up dark fiber. If knowledge
is Google's goal, buying up dark fiber is just the start.

Access to dark fiber will give Google an opportunity to offer WiFi
Internet access, which they are already testing out here in San
Francisco, with a startup company called Feeva.

My answer to Ron was that Google wants everyone on broadband and it
wants to be the first page they see when they fire up their laptop.

Now, you might say, "Well, so, what? You can go elsewhere on the Web."
Yes, but not before you give Google your information -- whereabouts,
interests, intent, etc. If you want free access or cheap access, you'll
have to give up something, like your information, and your whereabouts.
You must give Google knowledge.

To the extent that offering free WiFi enables Google to access your
location, that's another piece of information or knowledge they have
about you. Knowing where we are can be a critical component in
understanding who we are.

"Getting people connected to information wherever they are continues to
be a focus area for us," said Larry Page, Google's co-founder and
president of products, on a conference call, following Google's
third-quarter blowout results. "One highlight is a bid we've submitted
to offer free wireless Internet access to the city of San Francisco.
This is an opportunity to make San Francisco a test ground for new
location-based technology."

See Net Sense: Free WiFi equals targeted ads.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?siteid=mktw&dist=nwtsense&guid=%7B40462329%2D2DE7%2D4B32%2DBFE5%2D6F39B705AF29%7D

To be sure, San Francisco hasn't given Google the OK, just yet.

It's also unclear whether local governments across the country won't
provide Internet access, like they provide roads and garbage pickup.
Still, San Francisco's mayor, Gavin Newsom, told me that he doesn't want
San Franciscans to be burdened with taxes for his WiFi initiative in the
city.

So, Google might have a good chance at experimenting, after all.

In San Francisco, when you fire up your laptop in Union Square, which
is one big free hot zone, you have to click onto the free Google WiFi
site and land on a Google search page. Down the road, Google might
potentially block you from roaming around the Web until you answer
certain questions, like, "Are you here to shop?" Or, "If you're here to
shop, what item are you seeking?" Or, "Would you like to find the
nearest Starbucks while you're here?"

See TV piece: Google's WiFi strategy
(http://www.marketwatch.com/tvradio/playerfull.asp?guid={C6AF8A84-8AAA-4647-923E-621E35BF82EB}&clip=wifi&type=video&siteid=mktw&dist=nwtsense)

Google maps would be a good starting point for its WiFi Internet
access, location-based services. Just like those maps in the mall that
highlight where you are in the mall with a box that says: "You are
here," Google maps can appear on the free WiFi homepage and say: "You
are here."

With increasing knowledge, the next thing you know, Google will be
saying: "We know where you are. Now, this is what you should do."
_______________________________________________________________________

SPENDING TIME ON GOOGLE

Google Maps is just one of the many properties that attract users and
provide Google with other data points to help them understand our
complicated multidimensional personalities.

Traffic to Google Maps (which is a feature on Google Local) was at 15
million in September, according to comScore Networks. It was the No. 3
most visited map site in that month, right behind Yahoo Maps, at No. 2,
and the No. 1 site, MapQuest, a division of Time Warner's (TWX) AOL. By
comparison to local properties, Google Maps surpasses InterActiveCorp's
(IACI) CitySearch, with 14.3 million unique visitors last month.
--

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Google Mapping New Direction

Google Maps' New Direction

By Tom Taulli
October 10, 2005

Since its launch in March, Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) mapping feature has
unleashed a torrent of creativity. For example, NYsee combines NY
traffic cameras, Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) traffic news, and street photos
from Amazon.com's (Nasdaq: AMZN) A9.com with Google Maps to make your
traveling experience a little less hectic. In a more Foolish vein,
GeoIndex melds Google Maps with Yahoo! Finance and the S&P 500 to show
returns based on where companies are headquartered.

This stuff is undeniably cool. But investors might well wonder how
Google plans to make money off its maps. Not surprisingly, the answer
revolves around advertising.

For example, Google announced last week that Google Maps will mark its
emergence from beta testing into full-fledged usefulness by changing its
name to Google Local. To see how the new version worked, I went to the
site, entered my home address, clicked "Find Business," and typed
"pizza." I got 10 results, with the closest one listed first, and saw
tiny flags corresponding to each result on an accompanying map. Moving
my mouse over each flag gave me the business's address, phone number,
and a brief description of the menu.

This new product has the makings of a killer application. "Local
information is huge," said Jared Cosulich, who operates his own
Google-mapping service at CommunityWalk. "The decision to combine the
two services recognizes the fact that the user's experience is
significantly increased when he or she can see information in the
context that ties it all together."

The first step to capitalizing on all this local information will likely
involve Google's AdWords program, which provides ads based on the
keywords used in a given search. But Google Local's real promise lies in
"in-map" advertising. For example, as you zoom into areas of a map,
Google may serve up ads based on businesses in the surrounding streets
or neighborhoods -- and perhaps display them within the map itself.
"Whatever advertising medium is chosen," said Mike Pegg, who operates
Google Maps Mania, "I'm confident it will be relevant and non-intrusive
to the map you are viewing."

In less than a year, Google Local has become online mapping's No. 2
player, with 14.3 million unique visitors. (Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX)
America Online is still the leader, with 39 million unique visitors.)
What's more, according to The Kelsey Group, the local online advertising
market should reach roughly $3.4 billion by 2009. Google's rapid growth
in mapping -- and its sophisticated searching -- should help position it
to grab a healthy portion of this market.

Time Warner and Amazon.com are